Woman Makes $375,000 On OnlyFans By Posting Hairy Armpits
Who knew that not shaving your armpits could actually PAY off? Literally. A model based in London named Fenella Fox says within the last two years, her hairy armpits haveā¦

PARK CITY, UT – JANUARY 23: Actress Traci Dinwiddie from the film “Find Love” poses for a portrait at the Getty Images Portrait Studio during the 2006 Sundance Film Festival on January 23, 2006 in Park City, Utah. (Photo by Mark Mainz/Getty Images)
(Photo by Mark Mainz/Getty Images)Who knew that not shaving your armpits could actually PAY off? Literally. A model based in London named Fenella Fox says within the last two years, her hairy armpits have earned her $375,000.
The 28-year-old model says she initially stopped shaving her armpits in protest of what is expected of women. Men aren't expected to shave their underarms, so why should women be expected to?
Although she's made all that money, her sex life hasn't been as successful. The model says some men have supported her decision to grow out her underarms. One man, she said, admired her for it and embraced her decision. She said, "I've had one make-out session since [shaving], where the guy kissed my armpit hair and commented that he loved my female empowerment. While this made me feel respected and appreciated, the experience was very unexpected."
However, a lot of other men have called her 'disgusting', 'dirty' and 'unhygienic' for it.
She told the Daily Mail that she's even received death threats because of her choice not to shave. She said, "Some have said I'll be "single forever" and will "never get a man".
Despite this, Fox says she's happy with her armpits and doesn't even notice them that much anymore. She said not shaving makes her feel sexy, more womanly, and empowered. Lifting up her arms in public makes her feel "proud".
The London model explained that she grew up being "highly sexualized" and experienced being groped by a classmate. She began an OnlyFans account to show men that they can "look but not touch".
Fox encourages all women to embrace their natural body hair, as well as the rest of the natural naked body. She also encourages women to question the norm of shaving, since not shaving has been "life-changing for her".
Have you ever gone without shaving?
Millennials we take a lot of heat. I know you've heard the stereotypes-entitled, parentally dependent, emotionally fragile. But it also hasn't been easy, so you can't place all the blame on us. And if you're reading this in one of the Carolina's then it really hasn't been easy. In fact, North Carolina and South Carolina both rank in the bottom half of states for millennials. This is according to a new study by Wallethub.
Millennials are currently the largest generation, with a population of around 80 million. This means that millennials have a huge influence on American culture and consumption. But statistically, most are economically worse off than their parents.
The millennial experience is not the same everywhere. WalletHub compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine where this generation has thrived and struggled. They examined each state and DC across 34 key metrics to determine the best and worst states for millennials. Both Carolinas ranked in the bottom half making them two of the worst states.
Keep reading to see where North Carolina millennials ranked.
1. Washington

Total Score: 67.45
Affordability: 6
Education & Health: 17
Quality of Life: 2
Economic Health: 3
Civic Engagement: 6
2. District of Columbia
Total Score: 65.34
Affordability: 27
Education & Health: 2
Quality of Life: 1
Economic Health: 26
Civic Engagement: 15
3. Massachusetts
Total Score: 63.72
Affordability: 25
Education & Health: 3
Quality of Life: 4
Economic Health: 17
Civic Engagement: 22
4. Utah
Total Score: 62.90
Affordability: 20
Education & Health: 7
Quality of Life: 9
Economic Health: 1
Civic Engagement: 30
5. Illinois

Total Score: 60.28
Affordability: 2
Education & Health: 4
Quality of Life: 8
Economic Health: 46
Civic Engagement: 18
6. Minnesota
Total Score: 60.22
Affordability: 12
Education & Health: 16
Quality of Life: 6
Economic Health: 18
Civic Engagement: 27
7. Oregon
Total Score: 58.90
Affordability: 34
Education & Health: 14
Quality of Life: 16
Economic Health: 14
Civic Engagement: 2
8. Wisconsin
Total Score: 58.68
Affordability: 21
Education & Health: 24
Quality of Life: 12
Economic Health: 31
Civic Engagement: 1
9. Virginia
Total Score: 57.82
Affordability: 39
Education & Health: 15
Quality of Life: 10
Economic Health: 20
Civic Engagement: 3
10. Colorado

Total Score: 57.55
Affordability: 49
Education & Health: 23
Quality of Life: 5
Economic Health: 10
Civic Engagement: 9
11. Nebraska
Total Score: 57.09
Affordability: 32
Education & Health: 27
Quality of Life: 13
Economic Health: 12
Civic Engagement: 10
12. Iowa
Total Score: 56.59
Affordability: 5
Education & Health: 25
Quality of Life: 23
Economic Health: 29
Civic Engagement: 5
13. Pennsylvania
Total Score: 56.41
Affordability: 19
Education & Health: 21
Quality of Life: 17
Economic Health: 32
Civic Engagement: 7
14. California
Total Score: 56.19
Affordability: 40
Education & Health: 19
Quality of Life: 7
Economic Health: 22
Civic Engagement: 21
15. Vermont

Total Score: 55.80
Affordability: 48
Education & Health: 10
Quality of Life: 18
Economic Health: 11
Civic Engagement: 14
16. South Dakota
Total Score: 55.50
Affordability: 7
Education & Health: 18
Quality of Life: 25
Economic Health: 6
Civic Engagement: 41
17. Maine
Total Score: 55.33
Affordability: 46
Education & Health: 11
Quality of Life: 30
Economic Health: 8
Civic Engagement: 4
18. New York
Total Score: 55.03
Affordability: 8
Education & Health: 12
Quality of Life: 3
Economic Health: 49
Civic Engagement: 47
19. New Hampshire
Total Score: 54.33
Affordability: 42
Education & Health: 13
Quality of Life: 22
Economic Health: 5
Civic Engagement: 37
20. Connecticut

Total Score: 53.79
Affordability: 35
Education & Health: 6
Quality of Life: 21
Economic Health: 45
Civic Engagement: 12
21. Ohio
Total Score: 53.68
Affordability: 4
Education & Health: 28
Quality of Life: 24
Economic Health: 40
Civic Engagement: 11
22. Texas
Total Score: 52.92
Affordability: 9
Education & Health: 51
Quality of Life: 11
Economic Health: 16
Civic Engagement: 26
23. North Dakota
Total Score: 52.69
Affordability: 13
Education & Health: 36
Quality of Life: 15
Economic Health: 13
Civic Engagement: 39
24. Michigan
Total Score: 52.38
Affordability: 3
Education & Health: 20
Quality of Life: 35
Economic Health: 42
Civic Engagement: 13
25. Arizona

Total Score: 52.35
Affordability: 26
Education & Health: 37
Quality of Life: 32
Economic Health: 4
Civic Engagement: 19
26. Rhode Island
Total Score: 52.34
Affordability: 47
Education & Health: 5
Quality of Life: 19
Economic Health: 9
Civic Engagement: 46
27. Idaho
Total Score: 52.15
Affordability: 31
Education & Health: 22
Quality of Life: 42
Economic Health: 2
Civic Engagement: 35
28. North Carolina
Total Score: 51.63
Affordability: 17
Education & Health: 29
Quality of Life: 33
Economic Health: 23
Civic Engagement: 20
29. New Jersey
Total Score: 51.33
Affordability: 36
Education & Health: 8
Quality of Life: 14
Economic Health: 39
Civic Engagement: 42
30. Tennessee

Total Score: 50.68
Affordability: 11
Education & Health: 33
Quality of Life: 39
Economic Health: 19
Civic Engagement: 23
31. Maryland
Total Score: 50.67
Affordability: 44
Education & Health: 9
Quality of Life: 20
Economic Health: 34
Civic Engagement: 38
32. Kansas
Total Score: 50.41
Affordability: 29
Education & Health: 30
Quality of Life: 36
Economic Health: 25
Civic Engagement: 8
33. Hawaii
Total Score: 49.78
Affordability: 51
Education & Health: 1
Quality of Life: 31
Economic Health: 27
Civic Engagement: 29
34. Montana
Total Score: 49.55
Affordability: 38
Education & Health: 32
Quality of Life: 29
Economic Health: 7
Civic Engagement: 36
35. Missouri

Total Score: 49.14
Affordability: 1
Education & Health: 44
Quality of Life: 26
Economic Health: 21
Civic Engagement: 43
36. Indiana
Total Score: 48.25
Affordability: 16
Education & Health: 35
Quality of Life: 38
Economic Health: 33
Civic Engagement: 24
37. Florida
Total Score: 47.70
Affordability: 37
Education & Health: 41
Quality of Life: 28
Economic Health: 15
Civic Engagement: 33
38. Georgia
Total Score: 46.42
Affordability: 15
Education & Health: 43
Quality of Life: 40
Economic Health: 37
Civic Engagement: 28
39. Delaware
Total Score: 45.46
Affordability: 28
Education & Health: 26
Quality of Life: 41
Economic Health: 24
Civic Engagement: 45
40. Wyoming

Total Score: 43.44
Affordability: 41
Education & Health: 34
Quality of Life: 37
Economic Health: 35
Civic Engagement: 40
41. Alabama
Total Score: 42.02
Affordability: 14
Education & Health: 48
Quality of Life: 49
Economic Health: 38
Civic Engagement: 25
42. Kentucky
Total Score: 41.94
Affordability: 10
Education & Health: 39
Quality of Life: 45
Economic Health: 36
Civic Engagement: 44
43. Oklahoma
Total Score: 41.63
Affordability: 23
Education & Health: 50
Quality of Life: 44
Economic Health: 41
Civic Engagement: 31
44. Alaska
Total Score: 41.57
Affordability: 50
Education & Health: 40
Quality of Life: 27
Economic Health: 48
Civic Engagement: 16
45. South Carolina

Total Score: 40.76
Affordability: 18
Education & Health: 31
Quality of Life: 48
Economic Health: 28
Civic Engagement: 51
46. Nevada
Total Score: 39.86
Affordability: 45
Education & Health: 46
Quality of Life: 34
Economic Health: 30
Civic Engagement: 49
47. Louisiana
Total Score: 45
Affordability: 22
Education & Health: 45
Quality of Life: 43
Economic Health: 50
Civic Engagement: 32
48. Arkansas
Total Score: 37.40
Affordability: 32
Education & Health: 49
Quality of Life: 47
Economic Health: 47
Civic Engagement: 34
49. New Mexico
Total Score: 36.28
Affordability: 43
Education & Health: 42
Quality of Life: 46
Economic Health: 44
Civic Engagement: 48
50. West Virginia

Total Score: 35.53
Affordability: 24
Education & Health: 38
Quality of Life: 51
Economic Health: 43
Civic Engagement: 49
51. Mississippi
Total Score: 34.94
Affordability: 30
Education & Health: 47
Quality of Life: 50
Economic Health: 51
Civic Engagement: 17